Find the Right Solar Module for Your Project

Use our interactive filter to compare solar modules by power, cell type, size, weight, and more.

Suitable for all types of PV projects: from residential buildings to businesses and large-scale installations.

Select Model and Parameters

Model
Model
Specifications
Parameters

Types of Photovoltaic Modules and Their Properties

IBC

Sleek design, low temperature coefficient, and glare-free appearance. Suitable for corporate roofs with high aesthetic requirements for PV modules.

HJT

Bifacial high performance with high conversion efficiency and low degradation. Ideal for projects aiming for long-term, stable, and efficient solar energy production.

TOPCon

Established as a market standard, offering very high efficiency and reliable performance. Optimal for large commercial and industrial PV systems with consistently high power output.

PERC

Proven technology with an attractive price-performance ratio. Suitable for residential buildings and smaller PV projects where the balance between cost and yield matters.

Comparison of Key Parameters of Maysun Solar Photovoltaic Modules

Technology Type Efficiency Power Range Temperature Coefficient Structure
PERC 19–21% 400–550W –0.35%/℃ Monoglass / Glass-Glass
TOPCon 21–23% 430–600W –0.32%/℃ Mainly Glass-Glass
IBC 21.8–23.5% 430–600W –0.29%/℃ Monoglass
HJT 21.5–23.4% 500–700W –0.243%/℃ Glass-Glass

Note: The values given represent typical ranges and are for quick comparison only. Actual data is based on filter results and product details.

Criteria for Selecting Photovoltaic Modules

Criteria for Selecting Photovoltaic Modules

Efficiency and Cost Compared

Context: In the photovoltaic sector, efficiency is not an isolated indicator but closely linked to cell technology and investment structure.

Differences in efficiency: PERC modules typically range from 19–21 %, thanks to mature passivation processes and low production costs. TOPCon modules, building on PERC with additional tunnel oxide and polycrystalline silicon passivation, reach 21–22 % and are increasingly establishing themselves as the market standard. IBC and HJT technologies have already surpassed 22–23.5 % efficiency in mass production.

Market experience and logic: In projects with limited roof space, high-efficiency modules can significantly increase power generation per area, especially on urban commercial rooftops or warehouses with little space. This enables investors to achieve faster payback. However, high-efficiency modules require higher upfront investment, which burdens capital return. In contrast, PERC and TOPCon offer lower cost per watt, which often results in better ROI for large halls or warehouses.

Investment judgment: Efficiency and cost are not simply opposites of “high” and “low” but depend on roof space, financial framework, and project goals. For companies, the key is to find the right balance instead of blindly chasing maximum efficiency.

Temperature Coefficient and Performance in High Temperatures

Context: During operation, PV modules are inevitably influenced by temperature, and the cell structure directly determines performance under heat.

Technological differences: The temperature coefficient of PERC is typically around -0.34 %/°C, TOPCon at -0.32 %/°C, equivalent to a power loss of about 0.3 % per additional degree. IBC modules with back-contact reach about -0.29 %/°C, while HJT with heterojunction technology achieves even lower values around -0.243 %/°C.

Real impact: In Europe, summer air temperatures often rise to 28–32 °C, while the module surface can reach 60–65 °C under sunlight. Compared with STC (25 °C), an increase of 35–40 °C means:

• PERC modules lose approx. 11.9–13.6 % power;
• TOPCon approx. 11.2–12.8 %;
• IBC approx. 10.2–11.6 %;
• HJT only 8.5–9.7 %.

This difference adds up to several thousand kWh per year and directly affects long-term revenues.

Further comparison: At surface temperatures above 45 °C, losses are: PERC 15.3 %; TOPCon 14.4 %; IBC 13.1 %; HJT 10.9 %. This shows: Under extreme heat, HJT is clearly advantageous, IBC remains stable, and both ensure higher production continuity than PERC and TOPCon.

Investment relevance: Across Europe, on dark industrial rooftops or during summer electricity price peaks, a lower temperature coefficient significantly improves cash flow stability. In other words: the temperature coefficient is not a minor detail, but a decisive factor for real returns.

Applicability of Glass-Foil and Glass-Glass Modules

Context: The choice between glass-foil and glass-glass is not a simple matter of pros and cons but depends on cell technology and application scenario.

Market experience with glass-foil: PERC modules in glass-foil design were installed more than ten years ago and continue to operate stably in many places with 85–90 % of their initial output. For roofs with low load capacity or restricted installation conditions, glass-foil remains a valid option – lightweight, easy to install, and reliable when correctly certified.

Structural advantages of glass-glass: Double glass layers provide tighter encapsulation, higher resistance to moisture and heat, lower PID risk, and slower power degradation. The annual degradation factor is about 0.1–0.2 % lower than glass-foil, which means 3–5 % higher yield over 25–30 years. Thus, glass-glass is especially useful for industrial halls or agri-PV with long lifespans – despite higher weight and more difficult handling.

Why IBC glass-foil is “the optimal choice among glass-foil”:

Structural compatibility: IBC shifts anode and cathode to the back side, with fewer soldering points and lower failure risks. This makes the technology particularly suitable for glass-foil – reliable and lightweight.

Performance under heat: At approx. -0.29 %/°C, an IBC glass-foil module loses only 10.2–11.6 % at +35–40 °C. In comparison: PERC (-0.34 %/°C) loses 11.9–13.6 %, TOPCon (-0.32 %/°C) 11.2–12.8 %. IBC therefore ensures more stable summer yields.

Costs: Lower weight makes transport, installation, and permitting easier – ideal for old or weak roofs. This increases installation speed and reduces costs, often resulting in a more favorable ROI.

When to prefer glass-glass: In conditions with high humidity, salt or ammonia exposure, heavy snow load, or a 30-year operating horizon, glass-glass is the safer choice. HJT and TOPCon are mostly used in glass-glass configurations here.

Investment judgment: Glass-foil vs. glass-glass is a question of “technology × application”:
• Limited load capacity, tight conditions, hot summers, fast ROI → glass-foil, especially IBC glass-foil.
• Harsh environments, very long lifespans, degradation sensitivity → glass-glass.

Certifications and Warranties

Context: For rooftop and industrial projects, certifications and warranties form the basis for safety, environmental compliance, and long-term stability.

Sustainability and safety standards: Our modules comply with European RoHS directives, reduce the use of hazardous substances, and increase the environmental friendliness of photovoltaic systems.

International certifications: With tests such as TÜV and CE, our products are tested for humidity/temperature cycles, mechanical loads, and PID effects. These standards reflect material and process quality and guarantee reliability in the European market.

Long-term investment security: We offer a 25-year linear performance warranty as well as a product warranty. This supports investors with stable returns and minimized risks over the entire project lifespan.

Application Scenarios for Photovoltaic Modules
Application Scenarios for Photovoltaic Modules
Photovoltaic modules – project scenario

FAQ

In Europe, photovoltaic modules must comply with IEC 61215 and IEC 61730 standards and be tested by accredited bodies such as TÜV. For rooftop projects, some countries additionally require a fire safety classification (e.g., Class A) to meet building and safety regulations.

Technically yes, but the roof’s load-bearing capacity as well as its size must be considered, and compatibility with inverters and mounting structures ensured. In medium and large EPC projects, high-power modules can significantly increase the return on investment (ROI), while on smaller rooftops a more cautious selection is advisable.

The electrical performance of Full Black solar modules is almost identical to that of standard modules; the main advantage lies in aesthetics and seamless roof integration. In particular, markets such as Italy, France, and the Benelux countries show strong customer preference for this design.

The temperature coefficient determines the power losses of a module at high temperatures. In the summer months of Southern Europe, modules with a lower coefficient – such as IBC or HJT modules – maintain their output much better. In Central and Northern Europe, the impact is comparatively smaller.

Manufacturers typically offer a linear performance warranty over 25 years along with a product warranty of 10–15 years. Buyers should carefully check whether material defects or transport damage are also covered.

Local warehouses and after-sales services are available in Germany and Italy. This significantly shortens delivery times, and in case of problems with the solar modules, replacements or service interventions can be provided more quickly – an important advantage for minimizing project risks.

Are Glass-Glass PV Modules Right for Your Project? How to Choose?

Are Glass-Glass PV Modules Right for Your Project? How to Choose?

 

How to Choose the Most Suitable Solar Panels for Commercial and Industrial Use in 2025

How to Choose the Most Suitable Solar Panels for Commercial and Industrial Use in 2025

 

2025 European Photovoltaic Policy Map: Deployment Paths and Regional Strategies for Commercial and Industrial Photovoltaics

2025 European Photovoltaic Policy Map: Deployment Paths and Regional Strategies for Commercial and Industrial Photovoltaics

Scroll to Top